MEDIA
COMPARISON CHART |
4-Excellent |
3-Good |
2-Fair |
1-Poor |
|
MEDIA |
AIMED
AT
RIGHT TARGET |
CLARITY
OF MESSAGE |
COST
PER PROFITABLE CONTACT |
PERMANENCE |
FLEXIBILITY |
COMPETITION
FOR
ATTENTION |
TOTAL |
NEWSPAPERS |
Distribution
wasted on
a large scale |
Succeeds
in clearly
telling Who-
What-Where |
Very
high
cost when
market
is limited |
|
Message
can be changed quickly |
Hundreds
of other ads competing for attention |
11 |
MAGAZINES |
In the
case of Trade Journals, generally aimed correctly |
Succeeds
in clearly telling Who-What-Where |
Specifically
in Trade Journals,
fair; otherwise poor |
May
be visible a week or two |
Depends
on frequency of publication |
Other
ads prominent and
vying for
attention |
14 |
RADIO |
Very
high percentage of "deaf ears" waste |
Tells
Who-
What-Where,
but visual
stimulus more effective |
Much
waste for little profitable contact |
|
|
Many
ads
in quick
sequence |
11 |
TELEVISION |
Large
scale waste, even on local stations |
Visually
and audibly effective |
|
|
Again
as radio, can be changed momentarily |
Many,
many ads, one following another |
12 |
INTERNET/
BANNER ADVERTISING |
Wide
distribution with very low conversion rate |
May
show
Who-What-Where in click-thru |
Very
low cost per profitable contact |
Visible
a week
or two,
but quickly disappears |
|
Many
other ads competing for attention |
13 |
DIRECT
MAIL |
Can
be
precisely
aimed at
decision-makers |
Graphically
shows Who-
What-Where |
Low
cost per profitable contact |
After
consideration, will be discarded |
Message
can
be changed
quickly |
Accompanies
other correspondence, ads, etc. |
20 |
CALENDAR
ADVERTISING |
Direct
to only
bona fide customers and prospects |
Clearly
shows Who-What-Where |
Very
low cost
per profitable contact |
|
Monthly
copy changes can improve
flexibility |
Advertiser
has "stage"
to himself |
22 |